A survey of laboratory biosafety and protective measures in blood transfusion departments during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Thousands of healthcare workers (HCWs) have been infected with 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Laboratory personnel in blood transfusion departments may be infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) if laboratory biosafety protection is insufficient. Therefore, we investigated the current situation of laboratory biosafety protection in blood transfusion departments to determine how to improve the safety of laboratory processes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online survey was conducted in blood transfusion departments from 1st to 6th May 2020 in China. A total of 653 individuals completed the questionnaire. The questionnaire was designed with reference to COVID-19 laboratory biosafety summarized in Annex II. All responses were summarized using only descriptive statistics and expressed as frequencies and ratios [n (%)]. RESULTS: Most participants were concerned about COVID-19. Some participants had inadequate knowledge of COVID-19. Two participants stated that there were laboratory personnel infected with SARS-CoV-2 in their departments. A total of 31 (4.7%) participants did not receive any safety and security training. In terms of laboratory biosafety protection practices, the major challenges were suboptimal laboratory safety practices and insufficient laboratory conditions. CONCLUSION: The major deficiencies were insufficient security and safety training, and a lack of personal protective equipment, automatic cap removal centrifuges and biosafety cabinets. Consequently, we should enhance the security and safety training of laboratory personnel to improve their laboratory biosafety protection practices and ensure that laboratory conditions are sufficient to improve the safety of laboratory processes.

Cautions on the laboratory indicators of COVID-19 patients on and during admission.

BACKGROUND: Different disease severities of COVID-19 patients could be reflected on clinical laboratory findings. METHODS: In this single-centered retrospective study, demographic, clinical, and laboratory indicators on and during admission were compared among 74 participants with mild, moderate, critical severe, or severe classification. Risk factors associated with disease severity were analyzed by multivariate analyses. The AUC and 95% CI of the ROC curve were calculated. RESULTS: The most common manifestations of these patients were fever and cough. Critical severe or severe group owned the longest length of stay (23 (19,31), p < 0.001). After multivariate logistic regression, independent influence factors on admission for severity of disease were CK-MB (OR 0.674; 95% CI 0.489-0.928; p = 0.016), LDH (OR 1.111 or 1.107; 95% CI 1.026-1.204 or 1.022-1.199; p = 0.009 or 0.013), normal T-BIL (OR 4.58 × 10-8 ; 95% CI 3.05 × 10-9 -6.88 × 10-7 ; p < 0.001), LYM% (OR 0.008; 95% CI 0-0.602; p = 0.029), and normal ESR (OR 0.016; 95% CI 0-0.498; p = 0.019). Factors during hospitalization were normal T-BIL (OR 8.56 × 10-9 ; 95% CI 8.30 × 10-10 -8.83 × 10-8 ; p < 0.001), LYM (OR 0.068; 95% CI 0.005-0.934; p = 0.044), albumin (OR 0.565; 95% CI 0.327-0.977; p = 0.041), and normal NEU% (OR 0.013; 95% CI 0.000-0.967; p = 0.048). Combined indicators of AUC were 0.860 (LYM, LDH, and normal ESR on admission, p < 0.001) and 0.750 (CK-MB, LDH, and normal T-BIL during hospitalization, p = 0.020) when predicting for severe or critical severe patients. CONCLUSION: To pay close attention to the progression of COVID-19 and take measures promptly, we should be cautious of the laboratory indicators when patients on admission especially CK-MB, LDH, LYM%, T-BIL as well as ESR; and T-BIL, LYM, albumin, NEU% with the process of disease.

Clinical analysis of abnormal liver function in patients with new coronavirus pneumonia

Objective: To investigate the related factors of abnormal liver function in patients with new coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19).

Alimentary system is directly attacked by SARS-COV-2 and further prevents immune dysregulation caused by COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: SARS-COV-2 causes digestive system symptom, the effect of which remains equivocal. METHODS: Patients with COVID-19 were classified into four groups according to symptom. The study traced the onset and duration of symptoms, compared laboratory examinations and conducted bioinformatic analysis. Immune indices were further analysed. RESULTS: By March 16, 25 patients with COVID-19 and 13 with suspect COVID-19 were admitted to West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Digestive system symptom group had the highest level of ESR (mm/h, P < .0001), serum ferritin (ng/ml, P < .0001), hepatic enzymes (P < .05) and retentive lymphocyte count/percentage (P < .05) and its subsets (P < .05). Combined group (respiratory combined with subsequent digestive system symptom) had the highest level of IL-6 (pg/ml, P = .0046), CRP (mg/L, P = .0004) and moderate lymphocyte depletion. Respiratory system symptom and asymptomatic groups suffered the most from lymphocyte depletion (P < .05). Bioinformatic analysis indicated co-expression of binding related proteins of SARS-COV-2 (ACE2, TMPRSS2 and Furin) in small intestine. CD147 was extensively expressed in alimentary tract. CTSL, PIKfyve, TPC2 and CTSB could be detected with ≥moderate expressions in a variety of organs including alimentary system. CONCLUSIONS: Alimentary system is possibly attacked by SARS-COV-2 other than hyperinflammation or immune dysregulation caused by it. Involvement of alimentary system might further protect mild and moderate cases from lymphocyte depletion caused by COVID-19.

Correlation analysis of coagulation dysfunction and liver damage in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia: a single-center, retrospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is currently breaking out worldwide. COVID-19 patients may have different degrees of coagulopathy, but the mechanism is not yet clear. We aimed to analyse the relationship between coagulation dysfunction and liver damage in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 74 patients with COVID-19 admitted to the First People's Hospital of Yueyang from 1 January to 30 March 2020 was carried out. According to the coagulation function, 27 cases entered the coagulopathy group and 47 cases entered the control group. A case control study was conducted to analyse the correlation between the occurrence of coagulation dysfunction and liver damage in COVID-19 patients. RESULTS: Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), markers of liver damage, were positively correlated with coagulopathy (p = 0.039, OR 2.960, 95% CI 1.055-8.304; and p = 0.028, OR 3.352, 95% CI 1.137-9.187). Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GT), and total bilirubin (TBIL) were not statistically correlated with coagulopathy. According to the diagnosis and treatment plan, the included cases were classified into mild, moderate, severe, and critical. The results showed that the occurrence of coagulation dysfunction had no statistical correlation with the severity of COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Coagulation dysfunction in patients with COVID-19 is closely related to liver damage. A longer course of the disease may cause a vicious circle of coagulopathy and liver damage. Clinicians need to closely monitor coagulation and liver function tests and to give prophylactic or supportive therapy when needed.

Coagulation and immune function indicators for monitoring of coronavirus disease 2019 and the clinical significance. / 2019å† çŠ¶ç— æ¯’ç— å‡è¡€å’Œå ç–«åŠŸèƒ½æŒ‡æ ‡çš„ç›‘æµ‹åŠä¸´åºŠæ„ä¹‰.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the significance of coagulation and immune function indicators in clinical diagnosis and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: All patients with COVID-19 diagnosed and treated in First People's Hospital of Yueyang from January to March 2020 were enrolled. The general data of patients were collected. The patients were assigned into a light group (n=20), an ordinary group (n=33), a severe group (n=23), and a critically severe group (n=7) according to the severity of the disease. Coagulation and immune function indicators of each group were compared, and the relevance of coagulation and immune function indicators was analyzed. RESULTS: The age of COVID-19 patients in Yueyang City was mainly between 45 and 65 years old. There was a significant difference in the coagulation function and immune-related indicators in each group of patients (all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There are some abnormalities in coagulation and immune function in patients with COVID-19, which possess significance for clinical diagnosis and treatment of the disease.